https://elayneteng.wordpress.com/2015/05/13/2831/

I know it's weird that I just post the link of my diary post which I wanted to publish it as a public post, and you guys (the non-authorities) don't even ever try to hack into it and change the privacy status of the blog post to public as and when you wish, though you guys probably would say that "it's not our wishes but your wishes" yeah but I didn't ask you guys to do so. And then you guys would be thinking if that's the case then why did you post or type these then. Because you guys don't know the situation. And probably you guys would be thinking, if you don't type it out, how can we know...-_-||| If I could, I'll have already typed it out. This post is for those who know errr...they'll know it when they see the link...but the content...they won't be able to see it but they would have seen the content from other sites or messages etc. by the authorities. And anyways,  as hinted in the previous sentence, there are local authorities overseeing this diary of mine--https://elayneteng.wordpress.com-- (12:15pm: for quite some time already...in fact the investigations...). So yup.

Just saying:

I'm not blogger Han Hui Hui. For goodness's sake! It's been so many times already...even though our sites are different just that we have the same domain: BlogSpot.com...and that we were in the same place at one time, and that seriously...! I'm not going to type anymore unless I received the permission to release more information that I know of and had typed in my password-protected diary blog.
And that I had typed that I'm not Han Hui Hui in my private password-locked/protected diary blog before!

For goodness's sake, stop mixing me up with that incorrigible person.

Pardon me for my use of that strong word...

6:45pm: and do I look like her? For goodness's sake, my facebook link's already on the side bar of this blogweb! Stated the time, not because I was outside at 6:45pm but because I just remembered something and wanted to add this " and do I look like her? For goodness's sake, my facebook link's already on the side bar of this blogweb!"....

Just a thought: Would you laugh your fill before hardships fall upon you or even though knowing that hardships would make you feel bitter, would you make an effort to laugh heartily without letting the bitterness get into your laughter?

When enough is enough? What is the threshold at where rewards serve its purpose and do not encourage greed? What is the threshold at where the extent of punishment serves its purpose and do not cause one to turn even harsher, and against things which governs (e.g. the juridical law which is based on morals, ethics, moral principles, biblical law etc.). Nothing more but yet nothing less.

Are we feeding the greed of individuals or are we soothing and getting the individuals feel appreciated? (Pardon for my grammatical errors, currently under the stress in PTSD outbreak....)

overreaction: e.g. animal abuse cases

http://www.wisn.com/news/armed-agents-raid-animal-shelter-for-baby-deer/-/9373668/21272108/-/wvh1n7z/-/index.html

http://www.wisn.com/news/south-east-wisconsin/racine-kenosha/dnr-gets-death-threats-after-report-of-baby-deer-death/-/10151828/21313898/-/13i2jk5/-/index.html

This is why it is important not to overreact. The above just happened to be an example of such instances when there's an overreaction. What's the use of sending death threats? At its best, it just give the notion that there are some ppl like that out there. At its worst, it undermines the effort to bring such cases to light and to legal jurisdictions. I have heard of comments such as "why are they so uptight about..." or "why are they so against about..." about animal defenders activities. It's the way that the animals were treated, which shows the kind of attitude towards animals that puts us off. Such as in the finning of sharks (http://www.stopsharkfinning.net/) where sharks were being finned alive and were then thrown back to the sea to die a slow death. No doubt there are ppl out there who oppose just for the sake of opposing and etc. But what is the most important? At least from my point of view, the prevention of such cases of brutal cruelty from happening again. 

By the way, if one's curious about the incident, more info's http://www.change.org/petitions/justice-for-giggles-the-fawn

By the way, this person is a different person from the one i mentioned in the earlier post. Actually, I've heard the name Sharon many times, like after Rachel (that Rachel which is not my friend) couldn't keep up the act anymore because the orignal--me, clarified things,  Sharon's name would pop up among conversations.--fb status 3/1/2013

Didnt intend to type this para...And someone beat me (metaphorically) to it---typing the below-- for the person feared that I would reveal it  ...I knew that those imposters with ulterior motives were thinking of imitating one of my merits each. jiajun: guzheng(but he couldn't keep up with my 快指); rachel: wisdom (but she didnt realised that most of it is based on biblical truths, I juz saw a parallel of what's happening to His teachings), another guy: piano (I spent 4 hrs per day for ard 9 months perfecting those pieces with the foundation of learning piano since pri 4) etc... (those ppl shld thank God that that's all I can recall for now. To say the truth, I didnt not try hard to recall. And these things I usually didn't try to remember for what's the use of remembering it)

"The more Christlike one is, the greater the temptation to be mislead into doubting oneself. Not just others thinking that one's Jesus. But there are many differences which a Christlike Christian cannot achieve. Such as the resurrected body of Christ. Such as the perfect obedience.  Even becoming Christlike needs Christ's help."--fb status

"That was why I did say in one of the earlier comments "why is it me among His people...there are others who are more knowledgeable than me..." and also I did mention (to those who insist on hearing me say something about something) that I only know of the things that He reveal to me, what He doesnt reveal I don't know.  And I did say at times,  I am like this, at times I am like that.  Apparently, some of the vital words of the sentences were not heard etc. And the sword of the Spirit, is mentioned in Epehsians 6 and is part of God's amour which are given to Christians by God and to be worn. And He's always the lead. Even among church ministries. Therefore it's very important to follow His lead while leading the churches as the foundation of the church is Christ himself."