When enough is enough? What is the threshold at where rewards serve its purpose and do not encourage greed? What is the threshold at where the extent of punishment serves its purpose and do not cause one to turn even harsher, and against things which governs (e.g. the juridical law which is based on morals, ethics, moral principles, biblical law etc.). Nothing more but yet nothing less.

Are we feeding the greed of individuals or are we soothing and getting the individuals feel appreciated? (Pardon for my grammatical errors, currently under the stress in PTSD outbreak....)